Publications
Versions of some of these papers can also be found on my academia.edu page.
2020
"Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy". Inquiry. [Link]
"What ought a fruitful explicatum to be?". Erkenntnis. [Link]
"On Strawson's critique of explication as a method in philosophy". Synthese 197(3): 955–981. [Link]
2019
"Conceptual engineering, metasemantic externalism and speaker-meaning". Mind. [Link]
"Scharp on inconsistent concepts and their replacements, or: Can we mend these broken things?" Inquiry. [Link]
"Not wanted: On Scharp's solution to the liar". Erkenntnis. [Link]
2018
"The Austerity Framework and semantic normativity". Inquiry. [Link]
"How to find an attractive solution to the liar paradox". Philosophical Studies 175(7): 1661–1680. [Link] [View]
2017
"The explication defence of arguments from reference". Erkenntnis 82(6): 1253–1276. [Link]
"Does experimental philosophy have a role to play in Carnapian explication?" Ratio 30(4): 443–461. [Link] [Preprint]
"A normative argument against explosion". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6(1): 61–70. [Link] [Preprint]
2016
"Folk semantic intuitions, arguments from reference and eliminative materialism". In M. Hinton (ed.) Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Peter Lang, pp. 43–64.
Review of Haukioja (ed.) Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Language. Philosophical Quarterly 66(265): 879–882. [Link]
2015
"A revenge problem without the concept of truth". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4(3): 151–161. [Link]
"The cognitivist account of meaning and the liar paradox". Philosophical Studies 172(5): 1221–1242. [Link] [View]
2014
"Borg's minimalism and the problem of paradox". In P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.) Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 207–230. [Link] [View]
"Attitude ascriptions and acceptable translation". Analysis 74(3): 530–540. Critical notice of Mark Richard's Context and the Attitudes: Meaning in Context, Volume 1. [Link] [View]
Versions of some of these papers can also be found on my academia.edu page.
2020
"Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy". Inquiry. [Link]
"What ought a fruitful explicatum to be?". Erkenntnis. [Link]
"On Strawson's critique of explication as a method in philosophy". Synthese 197(3): 955–981. [Link]
2019
"Conceptual engineering, metasemantic externalism and speaker-meaning". Mind. [Link]
"Scharp on inconsistent concepts and their replacements, or: Can we mend these broken things?" Inquiry. [Link]
"Not wanted: On Scharp's solution to the liar". Erkenntnis. [Link]
2018
"The Austerity Framework and semantic normativity". Inquiry. [Link]
"How to find an attractive solution to the liar paradox". Philosophical Studies 175(7): 1661–1680. [Link] [View]
2017
"The explication defence of arguments from reference". Erkenntnis 82(6): 1253–1276. [Link]
"Does experimental philosophy have a role to play in Carnapian explication?" Ratio 30(4): 443–461. [Link] [Preprint]
"A normative argument against explosion". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6(1): 61–70. [Link] [Preprint]
2016
"Folk semantic intuitions, arguments from reference and eliminative materialism". In M. Hinton (ed.) Evidence, Experiment and Argument in Linguistics and Philosophy of Language, Peter Lang, pp. 43–64.
Review of Haukioja (ed.) Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Language. Philosophical Quarterly 66(265): 879–882. [Link]
2015
"A revenge problem without the concept of truth". Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4(3): 151–161. [Link]
"The cognitivist account of meaning and the liar paradox". Philosophical Studies 172(5): 1221–1242. [Link] [View]
2014
"Borg's minimalism and the problem of paradox". In P. Stalmaszczyk (ed.) Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 207–230. [Link] [View]
"Attitude ascriptions and acceptable translation". Analysis 74(3): 530–540. Critical notice of Mark Richard's Context and the Attitudes: Meaning in Context, Volume 1. [Link] [View]
